What would it mean to say that one’s questions or desire for knowledge are “worldly” or prideful?
Consider first what it actually means to know something. When contemporary Philosophers discuss knowledge, they speak of having a justified true belief about the object of knowledge. In this way there are essentially three parts to knowledge; essentially one must have a belief. Secondly, that belief must be true. Finally, one must be justified in holding that belief such that they have good reasons or evidence to accept the belief in question. For example, if I were to have knowledge of the proposition that “I don’t owe any taxes to the IRS,” I would have to first have the belief “I don’t owe any taxes to the IRS.” Secondly, that belief must be true. And finally, I must be justified in accepting the belief “I don’t owe any taxes to the IRS” such that I have good reasons or evidence to accept this belief by way of receipts, a statement in the mail, etc.
The important thing is that in order to have knowledge, one must have a certain degree of justification, and acquiring greater justification (i.e. more and better reasons or evidence) to believe something is a good thing. Therefore thinking hard and asking deep questions is a prime way to increase one’s justification and confidence in one’s beliefs, including beliefs about God and the teachings of Scripture.
Interestingly, in addition to breaking down knowledge into three constituent parts, philosophers also speak of different kinds of knowledge. For example, having knowledge of the kinds of statements that give me information, such as “Paris makes the best food in the world,” is known as propositional knowledge. This is knowledge that…Paris makes the best food in the world or knowledge that “Paris is the capital of France” By contrast it is another thing to know “Paris makes the best food in the world” in an experiential way by walking its streets, smelling the fresh bread and tasting the wine. This kind of experiential knowledge is known as knowledge by acquaintance. There is also a third kind of knowledge by which one acquires a certain skill or ability such as riding a bike which is known as know-how. A child can have know-how in regards to riding a bike but not be able to explain the process propositionally.
What is important to point out for our purposes is that one can be arrogant and prideful about all sorts of “knowledge,” even if it is not academic or propositional knowledge. This should serve as a sober warning to those of us in ministry who might falsely assume we are innocuous to pride and arrogance because we were not formally educated (as in seminary for example). The antidote to pride is not anti-intellectualism or ignorance, but humility (Eph. 4:2; Phil. 4:8; Jam. 4:6; 1 Pet. 3:8, 5:5-6).
Humility is required because it is recognition of our finiteness as creatures given our inability to know everything and because our identity in Christ does not depend on our intellectual abilities. To be sure, our desire to know more and more may reveal deeper desires or motivations, which may be sinful or contrary to scriptural truths. For example it is easy to think “the more I know, the more in control I am of my life and destiny,” or “If I know more, I can prove myself to be better than others and exert my power and will over them,” etc. Such desires and motivations echo something like the forbidden knowledge obtained in the Garden of Eden (Genesis 3) and the desire to make a name for oneself in the Tower of Babel (Genesis 11:1-8). Nevertheless, we are called to worship God with every part of our being including our intellect.
